tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post165240652618299730..comments2024-03-24T23:22:43.753+00:00Comments on Tony's Musings: Scrutiny and the Historical RecordTonyTheProfhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10486414706261508994noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-51382995341572783342011-06-29T21:28:20.123+00:002011-06-29T21:28:20.123+00:00Another good posting Tony. The Blogs are doing ste...Another good posting Tony. The Blogs are doing sterling work. <br /><br />rsrico sordahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09370637157786202673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-54308912385385961832011-06-29T14:52:50.578+00:002011-06-29T14:52:50.578+00:00I agree totally about Daniel W. He appears to be t...I agree totally about Daniel W. He appears to be the sort of bloke who will examine the facts carefully and objectively and then form a balanced view. I feel sure that if he were to discover that ILM & Co were completely in the right he would not hesitate to say so publicly, thus vindicating their position. <br />On the other hand, I suspect that ILM & Co believe in their hearts that their performance will not stand up to scrutiny - especially by someone as intellectually able as Daniel W and so ............Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-28208056037911825932011-06-29T14:19:31.513+00:002011-06-29T14:19:31.513+00:00Tony.
The point is, if there's nothing to hid...Tony.<br /><br />The point is, if there's nothing to hide, then there's nothing to fear. ILM shouldn't be trying to stop ANYBODY looking at this. The fact that he is just arouses suspicion.voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-5046958792293603522011-06-29T14:15:34.452+00:002011-06-29T14:15:34.452+00:00Well to be fair to Senator Le Marquand, and I tend...Well to be fair to Senator Le Marquand, and I tend to bend over backwards to try and be fair, I can think of at least one politician who might make political capital out of the situation just for the publicity, especially in election year. I could understand his concern if that had been the case.<br /><br />But to take umbrage at Deputy Wimberley, a politician who has never ever shown the slightest ambition to garner publicity for the sake of it... !!TonyTheProfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10486414706261508994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-83540940616072171242011-06-29T12:32:04.849+00:002011-06-29T12:32:04.849+00:00Tony.
What can one say? Ian Le Marquand just does...Tony.<br /><br />What can one say? Ian Le Marquand just doesn't know when to put that filthy great shovel of his down.<br /><br />One would have thought if he had nothing to hide and everything was above board, then it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference who sat on the Scrutiny Panel. Indeed if he was that confident he would/could suggest they find the most prejudice members there are to scrutinise this Report in order to give more weight to the theory there's nothing to hide.<br /><br />If there's nothing to find, then it can't be found, no matter who is looking for it!voiceforchildrenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825129148579102037noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-76390344171503806312011-06-29T11:57:18.337+00:002011-06-29T11:57:18.337+00:00Top class post Mr ProfTop class post Mr ProfAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9095270985170721876.post-15974620827369123472011-06-29T08:12:21.687+00:002011-06-29T08:12:21.687+00:00Once again, a lucid and well-reasoned posting. Tha...Once again, a lucid and well-reasoned posting. Thank you.<br />I must agree with you about ILM's apparent knee-jerk reaction. He has demonstrated consistently that he does not react well to any form of criticism. Indeed, his usual reaction is to engage in legalistic waffle in an attempt to both belittle the "opposition" and to obfuscate the issue.<br />It also appears that (whether he realises it or not) he is of the frame of mind that those who do not wholly agree with him are necessarily against him - i.e. the enemy!<br />As an impartial but interested observer, I am now more than ever interested to see how this issue develops.<br />Thanks once again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com