Published in 1950, this is an interesting snapshot of the Island and its customs as it was in the immediate post-war period, and not without humour. Most guide books of the time give the tourist information, or give the impressions of an outsider to the Island, but this is in "inside view", which is rarer.
Jersey Our Island: A Brush with the French – Part 2
By Sidney Bisson
Jersey Our Island: A Brush with the French – Part 2
By Sidney Bisson
D-day for the invasion of Jersey was December 26th, 1780. The
idea was evidently to surprise the defenders before they had recovered from
their Christmas celebrations. On Christmas night there was a spy scare. A light
signal was seen on the north coast, answered by one from the coast of France.
Perhaps because it was Christmas, no one seems to have done very much about it,
though it was later supposed to have informed the French that the coast was
clear of English naval units.
On Boxing Day the expedition sailed from Granville, twelve hundred
men with four field guns and two mortars in boats of shallow draught to
facilitate a beach landing. It is surprising that Baron de Rullecourt, who
commanded the expedition, should have been content with such a small force, as
he had been second in command to the Prince of Nassau, whose much larger
expedition had been unable to gain a footing the previous year. No doubt he
relied on an element of surprise to make up for his smaller numbers. Nassau had
attacked in daylight under cover of naval guns. Rullecourt proposed to land his
men under cover of darkness.
The first attempt failed. Contrary winds prevented the ships
from making Jersey, and they had to take refuge amongst the Chausey Islands, a
small group off the coast of France. Here, according to one account, some of
the men complained of cold and hunger. Whereupon Rullecourt split one man's
head open with his sword and condemned another to be tied to a rock and drowned
by the incoming tide. By January 5th the weather, and perhaps his temper, had
moderated, and the ships set sail once more.
This time the wilds were favourable, and shortly before mid=
night the troops started to disembark on the extremely rocky beach of La
Rocque. Rullecourt had as pilot a Jerseyman named Pierre Journeaux, who had
taken refuge in France after killing a man in a brawl. Journeaux was a La
Rocque man, and presumably knew what he was about when he offered to guide the French
ships along this very dangerous coast. Why he did not take them to the sandy
beach a little to the north is a mystery. It has been suggested that he aimed
at it and was swept south by the currents. More likely Rullecourt was afraid
that the obvious landing places might be guarded. Whatever the reason, he lost two
of his transports during the operation, and two hundred men were drowned,
including his artillerymen.
Between five and seven hundred men reached the shore and immediately
occupied a small battery, which was apparently undefended. Leaving a small
party here, Rullecourt marched the rest of his troops to St. Helier, avoiding
the coast road, which was likely to be watched. He reached the outskirts of the
town at dawn, halted his troops, traditionally-in what is now Roseville Street,
and sent out scouts. A house in Roseville Street still bears the commemorative
name of `The Halt.'
All being quiet, the march was resumed along La Colomberie, where
an old main who came out to see what was going on was promptly killed. The
sentry in the Royal Square suffered the same fate, and the guard was captured
except for one man who ran to the Hospital to warn the Highlanders of the 78th
Regiment who were quartered there.
The French could not keep their arrival secret much longer.
A number of people were roused by the commotion, and one of them, Captain
Hemery of the Jersey Militia, went to warn the Lieutenant-Governor, Major Corbet.
Corbet immediately ordered line to ride to Fort Conway and warn Captain
Campbell who was in charge of a detachment of the 83rd (Glasgow) Regiment
stationed there. Before Corbet could take any further action his house was
surrounded and he found himself a prisoner.
So far the various accounts of the invasion are in general agreement,
though they differ in matters of detail. What happened afterwards, and
particularly the order in which things happened is not so clear. Some reports
omit certain events completely, others give a different sequence of events. One
can only present what seems to be a logical sequence and hope that it is
correct.
So much does history depend on the historian !
Having rounded up various other officers and local
officials, Rullecourt had them brought to the Royal Court together with the
Lieutenant-Governor. Here he impressed on Major Corbet that the capture of the
island was a fait accompli. He claimed that he had landed several thousand men,
captured the 83rd Regiment at Fort Conway, and had two battalions in the
outskirts of the town and others it the rural districts. To back up his
assertions he sent messages to the troops that he claimed were in other parts
of the island, and wrote a letter to France announcing his success.
Finally he issued a proclamation to the inhabitants
guaranteeing their rights and privileges and freedom of religion if they
offered no resistance to his troops.
Hoping that Corbet would have been impressed by this
display, he now produced Articles of Capitulation for his signature. Corbet
started to argue, until Rullecourt dramatically placed his watch on the table
and announced that if the capitulation were not signed in half an hour he would
destroy the town. Corbet then signed, as did a Mr. James Hogg, who is described
as the `Fort Major.' Two civilian officials, the Avocat General and the Connétable
of St. Helier, were also pressed to sign, but refused in spite of being
threatened with death.
Apparently content with the military surrender, Rullecourt now
became more affable. Producing a commission from the King of France naming him
Governor, he announced that he would give an official dinner at Government
House that evening, and invited some of the prominent citizens to attend.
Whether they accepted or not is not recorded. Seeing that the defending forces
were still intact and none of the fortifications captured, Rullecourt seems to
have been remarkably optimistic. No doubt he relied on the orders which he had
compelled Corbet to issue being implicitly obeyed. All troops were to remain in
their barracks and offer no resistance.
He soon found out his mistake when, accompanied by Major Corbet,
he set off at the head of his troops to receive the capitulation of Elizabeth
Castle. No sooner were they in sight than the castle defenders fired a warning
shot over their heads. As they continued to advance, a second shot was fired
which caused some casualties.
The French halted and sent a messenger to the garrison with
a copy of the capitulation. Captain Mulcaster, who received him, stuffed the
papers in his pocket and said that he did not understand French. When the
officer pointed out the strength of the invaders and added that ten thousand
more men were expected the following day, Mulcaster replied grimly, `All the better.
We will have more to kill.' To emphasise his words he blindfolded the Frenchman
and led him to the top of the castle, where he showed him all the guns that could
be brought to bear on the troops if they advanced. Then he sent him away.
There being little hope of taking the castle by storm,
Rullecourt withdrew his troops to the town, which he would probably have set on
fire in his anger had not Corbet intervened and offered to send another message
to Captain Aylward, who was in command of the castle garrison, ordering him to
surrender. This time a Jerseyman was chosen to carry the message. Obviously
unwilling, he tried to excuse himself on the grounds that he was a poor horseman.
Rullecourt, guessing it was an excuse, ordered one of his men to ride behind
him to see that he did not fall off. Captain Aylward's reply was in the best
British tradition:
`You know our situation and strength; when we reflect that the
British flag has received Honour from the defence of this garrison in former
times, we will not suffer its lustre to be diminished, and are therefore
determined to hold out to the last.'
Ironically, he signs himself `Your most obedient Servant.'
No comments:
Post a Comment