Showing posts with label Hopkins Masterplan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hopkins Masterplan. Show all posts

Friday, 29 August 2008

National Gallery Briefing Notes

As it will no doubt surface again and again, here are a few notes on the "National Gallery". In November 2007, there was an informative question and answer session by Jim Perchard to Mike Vibert.

http://www.statesassembly.gov.je/documents/questions/17775-30744-6112007.htm

WRITTEN QUESTION TO THE MINISTER FOR EDUCATION, SPORT AND CULTURE BY SENATOR J.L. PERCHARD - ANSWER TO BE TABLED ON TUESDAY 6th NOVEMBER 2007

Question

Would the Minister advise members -
1. Who the members of the National Gallery Steering group are?
2. Who appointed the members of the National Gallery Steering group?
3. What the terms of reference of the National Gallery Steering group are?
4. Who was responsible for drafting of the terms of reference for the National Gallery Steering group?
5. What support, if any, is being given by States departments or bodies owned or controlled by the States to the National Gallery Steering group?
6. Which, if any outside consultants are advising the National Gallery Steering group or States departments over the proposal to develop a National Gallery on the Weighbridge site, the total estimated cost of all consultancy work in this regard and the mechanism in place for their funding?
7. Will the Minister make available any minutes of the National Gallery Steering group as an appendix to the answer to this question?


The reply gave the following information, with my notes:

1. The current members of the National Gallery Steering Group are: the Chairman of the Jersey Heritage Trust Jurat John de Veulle OBE, the Deputy of Grouville, the Connétable of St Helier, the Director of the Jersey Heritage Trust Mr Jon Carter, Mrs Melissa Bonn, Mrs Susie Pinel, Mr Jonathan Voak, Mr Robert Tilling, RI, MBE, Mr Ray Banks FRSA, the Curator of Art of the Jersey Heritage Trust Ms Louise Downie and the Cultural Development Officer Mr Rod McLoughlin. The group is chaired by the Bailiff, Sir Philip Bailhache.

Who are these people?

They can be divided into the following groups:

The Jersey Heritage Trust contingent is:
John de Veulle (Chairman), Seigneur of Augrès, Retired senior partner Ernst & Young
Mr Jon Carter, Director, Jersey Heritage Trust
Ms Louise Downie, Curator of Art, Jersey Heritage Trust

The States contingent is:
Connétable of St Helier, Simon Crowcroft
Deputy of Grouville, Carolyn Labey, Assistant Minister for Education, Sport and Culture

The States Quango contingent is:
Mr Ray Banks, Chairman Jersey Public Sculpture Trust
Mr Rod McLoughlin, Cultural Development Officer, Education, Sport and Culture

The commercial contingent is:
Mrs Melissa Bonn, the Channel Island representative for Christies, the fine art auctioneers.
Mr Jonathan Voak, founder of Atelier Limited. Atelier Limited is based in London and Jersey and deals mainly in 17th - early 20th century oil paintings, watercolours, drawings and etchings and offers a museum standard conservation service. The company operates from its office in Grouville, Jersey, and uses its London base near Tower Bridge to meet clients.
Mr Robert Tilling, local artist and jazz and blues player. Working primarily in watercolour, acrylic, gouache and charcoal, the majority of his work is based on local landscape and seascape. He is presently the Chairman of the Management Committee at the Jersey Arts Centre.

and finally, the "ordinary member of the general public" presence is represented by:

Mrs Susie Pinel, wife of Honorary ADC, Lieutenant Colonel John Pinel (Honorary ADC to the Lieutenant-Governor

2. The members of the Steering Group were invited to join by the Jersey Heritage Trust.
3. The Steering Group was established, following a meeting of the Jersey Heritage Trust in December 1999, "to produce a detailed feasibility study, project definition statement and outline architect's brief, identifying among other things a site and sources of funding".

In February 2008, it made its first and so far only public report. The report says the Weighbridge gallery could be funded by £10m from developer contributions from the Waterfront, and a £15m endowment from wealthy Islanders to cover running costs. They say the gallery should be run by Jersey Heritage, based across the Weighbridge square at the Jersey Museum. A pity they can't do the same for Island Youth facilities, or the Millennium Park!

http://www.thisisjersey.com/2008/02/23/a-national-gallery-at-no-cost-to-taxpayers/

4. The terms of reference above were drafted by the Jersey Heritage Trust which, as I have indicated, established the group. They follow a recommendation in the culture report of 2000 commissioned by the then Finance and Economics Committee.

5. Administrative support is provided within the Bailiff's Chambers. The Cultural Development Officer of the Education, Sport and Culture Department was invited on to the group this year to assist in the development of a strategy document for the group, as I recognise that if the matter were to be advanced it would be for me, as Minister for Education, Sport and Culture, to bring forward any such proposals. This work, which is currently in progress, includes obtaining the views of the Economic Development Department, the Economics Unit.

I've not as yet found anything relating to Philip Ozouf on this matter. He is keeping a low profile here.

6. Hopkins Architects are advising the National Gallery Steering Group on design matters. They are producing the following: a feasibility study report, an initial specification for the building, a three dimensional model, and perspective drawings to illustrate the urban design and architectural concept. This is under a fixed £30,000 contract with the Planning and Environment Department which is being funded though percentage for art contributions. The Economic Development Department has commissioned a report from Locum Consulting which is involved in a number of other projects related to the visitor economy. The question of the desirability of a gallery in this context featured in the Locum Destination Audit published in November 2006. The cost of the Locum report on the National Gallery is £7,500 which is being shared between the Economic Development Department and the Waterfront Enterprise Board.

7. As I have previously indicated, I intend to make public the strategy document when it is complete. I am advised that the Minister for Economic Development will also publish, with an accompanying note, the Locum Consulting report. The minutes of the National Gallery Steering Group, which date back more than seven years, are confidential to the group and it would be a matter of approaching the Chairman to seek the views of the group about releasing them

Don't expect any minutes then - this is Mike Vibert, the Senator who sat on the Kathi Bull report until it was released to the press. But in case you missed the consultation document , it was mentioned in Hansard back in 11 March 2008

http://www.statesassembly.gov.je/documents/hansard/12991-21658.htm#_Toc193699279

Deputy G.C.L. Baudains of St. Clement of the Minister for Education Sport and Culture regarding the consultation on the possibility of Jersey having a 'National Gallery': Would the Minister advise whether the consultation on the possibility of Jersey having a National Gallery is being co-ordinated by the Steering Group and not the Education, Sport and Culture Department? And if so, why?

Senator M.E. Vibert (The Minister for Education Sport and Culture): A report has been submitted to me on the creation of a National Gallery for Jersey by a Steering Group established by the Jersey Heritage Trust and it is this report that is currently out for consultation. I have made it clear and the Steering Group acknowledges this in its own report that it is most important, that it is an opportunity for the public to respond to the contents of the report. I as Minister have therefore undertaken this consultation exercise. The report and the supporting document are published on the States website and hard copies available in the normal way from the Public Library, the States Bookshop and from the contact centre at Cyril Le Marquand House. Respondents are invited to make known their views to one of the Assistant Directors of Education Sport and Culture at my department. The consultation is therefore being conducted by my E.S.C. (Education Sport and Culture) Department on my behalf.

The consultation closed in April 2008. The only notification I was able to find in the JEP was a mention that it would be coming in February 2008, in an article by Ben Quérée. Hardly headline grabbing stuff! I suspect it was tucked away in the fine print of the Jersey Gazette.

If you want to look at the consultation documents, they are here:

http://www.gov.je/ESC/Reports/NationalGallery+Consultation+Documents.htm


Here are a few choice snippets from the Final Consultation Report, which sets out why we can call it "National" (a paragraph which is a good candidate for Private Eye's Pseud's Corner), and what it will cost - apart from Staff costs which are mentioned only briefly.

In this connection it is worth observing that the Isle of Man quite unselfconsciously and entirely without hubris refers to 'Manx National Heritage', 'Manx National Week' and the "Manx National Youth Band" to give but a few examples. It vigorously dismisses any suggestion that its 'national day' lacks legitimacy. Neither is this purely a matter of semantics; it has been remarked upon that this sense of cultural confidence unites the community and readily communicates itself to visitors.

The admissions income is derived from the model of Mont Orgueil Castle, a site administered by JHT on the basis of a £9 admission ticket and 65,000 visitors annually, with the resulting figure of £585,000 adjusted to take account of the number of free admissions whether school children, senior citizens or others entitled to free entry.

With regard to the cost of the temporary exhibition programme, the Locum report suggests that it would be desirable to invest more than the £250,000 allowed in the JHT forecast, given that the attraction of visitors (and particularly return visitors) is closely related to investment in an appealing programme of temporary exhibitions. Locum advocates an annual budget of £500,000 for this purpose.


The steering group has been concerned to ensure that appropriate allowance is made for the ongoing maintenance of the building. The annualised figure of £85,000 included above is derived from Building Cost Information

An endowment sufficient to yield the £500,000 required to operate the gallery and to make provision to retain its real terms value is likely to require around £15m in capital according to the figure provided by Locum [Locum p.6]. It is accepted that there would have to be detailed discussions about the amount required for the endowment, balancing the capital sum required with the investment policy as it relates to risk. The principle is accepted that this sum will be raised by fund-raising.

There are many variables to consider when projecting staff costs.


The key variable factors are set out below: Opening times 7 days per week 360 days per year 10a.m.-5.00 p.m. (Summer) and 10 a.m.-4 p.m. (Winter) This factor strongly Impacts on requirement for visitor service assistants, stewards and site gardiens.


Programme activity: Three major Gallery exhibitions per annum will need at minimum (in addition to administration and management time, curatorial, marketing, finance, conservation, etc provided centrally through JHT organisaton): a technician working (exhibition build), loans registrar (exhibition administration), assistant curator (writing associated interpretative material for each exhibition and providing educational programmes), design post (production of general information, educational and marketing materials)


Security: The number of stewards is a function of the chosen exhibition type, conditions of loan and design layout. It is assumed there will be an average of two on duty at all times. Stewards will also be trained to provide additional visitor information.

"A great deal of my work is based on the landscape and still life which is composed by a process of imaginative reconstruction in which both observation and memory play important parts" wrote Robert Tilling. There is a lot of imaginative and creative reconstruction in the proposals for the "National" Art Gallery.

Thursday, 5 June 2008

The Lunatics have Voted in the Asylum


Just saw this on Channel Television:

Jersey's States have approved the Hopkins Masterplan to develop the Esplanade Quarter. The multi-million pound plan will see the underpass buried, offices and flats built on the site, and three public squares created. It's expected to take between seven and ten years to complete. Members approved the scheme late this afternoon by 40 votes to 6. Earlier in the day critics had tried to stall the plan by asking for a reference back. They wanted more information. But that move was defeated. Detractors fear there'll be traffic chaos for years to come, and the cost of treating the contaminated soil that'll have to be excavated will run into millions of pounds.


A few comments on the proposition.

Dictatorial powers are being used again, to use compulsory purchase if the States don't get their own way.

To approve the acquisition on behalf of the Public of the leasehold interest in an area of land which is held by AXA Sun Life Plc. situated at the rear of the Leisure Centre complex which forms part of the site of the Esplanade Quarter....to agree that, if it is not possible to agree with AXA Sun Life Plc. that it should sell its interest in the land referred to in sub-paragraph (b) above at a fair and proper price, the Minister for Planning and Environment should be empowered in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 119 of the Planning and Building (Jersey) Law 2002 to acquire such interest in land and any other interest therein by compulsory purchase on behalf of the Public in accordance with the provisions of the Compulsory Purchase of Land (Procedure) (Jersey) Law 1961,

They don't like Guy de Faye giving a blank cheque to developers for digging up property for drainage, but they do approve compulsory purchase for grand "masterplans".

Hopkins Architects Limited is one of the top architectural practices in Europe and has won many international accolades for its pioneering, often complex, high quality projects.

Let us not forget the Hastings Plaza project, where Hopkins were sent back to the drawing board

"We know this site must be developed, but to do so in a way that so blatantly… breaks fundamental urban design best practice, and fails to make even the simplest of contextual references, is not only grossly irresponsible but sets the poorest of precedents for private developers to follow."

"An early design which appeared confident, sensitive and restrained has become crowded as the promise of interesting forms in individual buildings is overwhelmed by the presence of an oversized car park and a reduction of the public space."

It will be interesting to see if the Masterplan fulfils its glossy brochure, or if the design will end up "crowded".

The Masterplan includes high quality office space for Jersey's thriving business community. Office space of the floor plate size and quality envisaged by the Masterplan is currently scarce in the Island despite there being demand for space of this type from a number of the largest financial and professional services operations in Jersey.

There is large office space, recently built (i.e. in the last 10 years) by Green Street Car park which is largely empty. And I am sure there are others. This is special pleading.

During the development there will principally be 2 phases of temporary traffic management. The first phase will cause little or no disruption to the flow of existing traffic and will be in place for approximately 2¼ years. The second phase will be more disruptive but will only be in place for the remaining 9 months of road construction. Whilst the second phase will disrupt road users, it is envisaged that the actual delay to journey times will only be a matter of minutes.

Note this very carefully!!! Although the whole building work will take 7 to 10 years, we are told that there will be no disruption for about 2 years, and then we will only have 9 months disruption. That should take us up to the next election!

The estimated long-term annual cost of maintaining and servicing the tunnel is £500,000 per annum. This cost consists of 2 main elements: (i) the cost of electricity to power lighting and ventilation; and (ii) the cost of maintaining the fabric of the tunnel (including maintenance and replacement of ventilation plant, lighting, signage, cleaning and maintaining the roadway).

Obviously a "green" environmentally friendly solution! At least they are addressing the problem of air quality, but that costs electricity and with rising energy costs, I am not convinced that £500,000 will prove sufficient. No doubt they'll slip the increase by later.

Notice that nothing at all is said about flooding prevention, which I suspect will incur extra costs.

The cost of maintaining the fabric of the tunnel and providing power will be met (as usual) by the Department for Transport and Technical Services. It should be noted that at present the Department has not been allocated a budget from which to fund this ongoing obligation.

That is good planning from the planning department! Well, some of that could always come from school milk being scrapped, and for the rest, let us increase GST?

The Esplanade Quarter is expected to take approximately 7 (not more than 10) years to complete.

I like the "three year" leeway on the timing!




A table of the votes is given below.





POUR: 40 CONTRE: 6 ILL: 1 EN DEFAUT: 3 NOT PRESENT: 3
CONTREPOURMISSING
Senator Stuart Syvret1
Senator Leonard Norman 1
Senator Frank Harrison Walker 1
Senator Wendy Kinnard 1
Senator Terence Augustine Le Sueur 1
Senator Paul Francis Routier 1
Senator Michael Edward Vibert 1
Senator Philip Francis Cyril Ozouf 1
Senator Terence John Le Main 1
Senator Ben Edward Shenton 1
Senator Frederick Ellyer Cohen 1
Senator James Leslie Perchard 1
Connétable Kenneth Priaulx Vibert 1
Connétable Kenneth Alan Le Brun 1
Connétable Thomas John du Feu 1
Connétable Derek Frederick Gray 1
Connétable Alan Simon Crowcroft 1
Connétable John Le Sueur Gallichan 1
Connétable Geoffrey William Fisher 1
Connétable Daniel Joseph Murphy 1
Connétable Michael Keith Jackson 1
Connétable Silvanus Arthur Yates 1
Connétable Graeme Frank Butcher 1
Connétable Peter Frederick Maurice Hanning 1
Deputy Robert Charles Duhamel 1
Deputy Alan Breckon1
Deputy Jacqueline Jeannette Huet 1
Deputy Frederick John Hill, B.E.M. 1
Deputy Gerard Clifford Lemmens Baudains1
Deputy Peter Nicholas Troy 1
Deputy Celia Joyce Scott Warren 1
Deputy Roy George Le Hérissier 1
Deputy John Benjamin Fox 1
Deputy Judith Ann Martin 1
Deputy Geoffrey Peter Southern1
Deputy Sarah Craig Ferguson 1
Deputy James Gordon Reed1
Deputy Patrick John Dennis Ryan 1
Deputy Carolyn Fiona Labey 1
Deputy Collin Hedley Egré 1
Deputy Jacqueline Ann Hilton 1
Deputy Guy William John de Faye 1
Deputy Paul Vincent Francis Le Claire 1
Deputy John Alexandre Nicholas Le Fondré 1
Deputy Deidre Wendy Mezbourian 1
Deputy Anne Enid Pryke 1
Deputy Sean Power 1
Deputy Shona Pitman1
Deputy Alan John Henry Maclean 1
Deputy Kevin Charles Lewis 1
Deputy Andrew David Lewis 1
Deputy Ian Joseph Gorst
Deputy Juliette Gallichan 1
6406



Hopkin's plans slammed
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=3047757

Wednesday, 12 March 2008

High Tides and Sunken Roads: The Hopkins Masterplan?

The high winds and high tides saw the crumbling of the sea wall at the end of Victoria Avenue the night before last, and also extensive flooding in Gloucester Street, right up to the Opera House, which was flooded. The area around there was awash with water.

I have a copy of the map which is part of the "Hopkin's Masterplan" in front of me, and the idea is to "join" the waterfront to town by sinking the road, and building an extensive commercial development - as usual beautifully prettyfied - above it. Apparently this can be paid for by the developers, who get the development land, who will meet the entire cost - with a "national art gallery" as a sweetener thrown in for free.

The proposed road sinks down into the underpass just about where it does at present when coming from the tunnel under Fort Regent, and it re-emerges from the depths just around Gloucester Street. That's right, the area that we can expect to be flooded if we get high tides and strong winds. Now wasn't that a bright idea!

I do hope that someone has the sense to bury the plan, rather than the road.