This letter appeared in the 26 March 2026 JEP. I have kept the writers name off this public space although as it was in the JEP, it could be considered a public engagement.
The core quantitative claims about education and qualifications in Jersey and the UK, and about male over‑representation in suicide, are well grounded in current official statistics. The overall narrative, that boys and young men are struggling in education, mental health, and purpose, and that this matters for everyone, is strongly supported by broader UK and international evidence, even where some local Jersey numbers need tightening.
At the end of the letter I make some suggestions.
Boys have lost their sense of purpose
I have two grown-up sons and today boys are falling behind in school, uni-versity and in mental health and feeling a sense of purpose.
Male loneliness is rising. Male suicide is dramatically higher than female suicide.
Yet raising this subject feels controversial - as if problems faced by boys some-how diminish the real challenges faced by women and people of other gender identities and sexual orientations.
Society should care about all people. You cannot ignore the numbers.
Across developed countries women now outnumber men at university. In the UK around 57% of students are women. The 2021 Jersey Census shows 45% of women aged 16-64 hold higher-level qualifications compared with 40% of men. Education reports about Jersey consistently show girls outperforming boys at GCSE level. Men account for about 68% of suicides in Jersey. Men make up the majority of those receiving treatment for drug misuse and this is concentrated among young adult males.
I'm 65 and my generation grew up in a very different world.
Housing was affordable. Careers were clearer. Manual jobs were plentiful. University was optional. You could leave school, learn a trade and, build a life.
Higher education is now the gateway to most careers. Around 65% of workers in finance and legal services hold higher-level qualifications. At the same time, many of the traditional pathways into adulthood that once existed for boys have faded. Modern classrooms also favour traits where girls tend to develop earlier. Boys, on average, mature later and often learn better through movement, experimentation and practical problem solving.
For most of history that wasn’t a problem, because boys had multiple pathways into adulthood. Many now simply disengage.
And the consequences extend. As education gaps widen, birth rates decline. Places like Jersey - with high housing costs and a highly competitive professional economy - are not immune.
This is not a gender war. But when large numbers of men lose purpose, they don't simply disappear. They withdraw. Or self-destruct. Youth offending (Jersey): Up 30-35% in the past three years, with most offences involving boys aged 13-17. Truancy (Jersey): Rose from 10% in 2022 to 14% in 2024, with boys aged .13-16 most affected. Under-25s are over-represented among those not in education, employment, or training, and young men are more likely to be unemployed or on income support.
For most of history masculinity was about responsibility. We stopped telling boys where they are needed.
My Comments
Low reading engagement is one of the strongest predictors of boys’ under‑achievement. Programmes that give boys material they actually enjoy (non‑fiction, graphic novels, practical topics) and build daily reading habits make a measurable difference.
Lessons that build in movement, hands‑on tasks, and problem‑solving (projects, experiments, outdoor learning, technical work) tend to re‑engage boys who switch off in purely desk‑based, talk‑heavy classrooms. This isn’t magic, but it’s one of the few things consistently recommended across reviews.
Boys are more likely to be excluded, sanctioned, or labelled rather than understood. Training staff to see behaviour as a signal, often of struggle with literacy, attention, or home stress, reduces exclusions and keeps boys in learning.
When apprenticeships, trades, and technical education are funded, respected, and clearly linked to real wages and progression, disengaged boys reappear. The World Bank’s review of male under‑achievement is blunt: credible labour‑market routes are one of the strongest protective factors for boys and young men.
Boys hear a lot about what’s wrong with men and very little about where they are genuinely needed: care work, teaching, youth work, fatherhood, craftsmanship, public service. Naming those as honourable, modern forms of masculinity matters.
For further reading:
https://www.menandboyscoalition.org.uk/boys-and-young-mens-education-toolkit
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/111041644611110155/pdf/Educational-Underachievement-Among-Boys-and-Men.pdf
At the end of the letter I make some suggestions.
Boys have lost their sense of purpose
I have two grown-up sons and today boys are falling behind in school, uni-versity and in mental health and feeling a sense of purpose.
Male loneliness is rising. Male suicide is dramatically higher than female suicide.
Yet raising this subject feels controversial - as if problems faced by boys some-how diminish the real challenges faced by women and people of other gender identities and sexual orientations.
Society should care about all people. You cannot ignore the numbers.
Across developed countries women now outnumber men at university. In the UK around 57% of students are women. The 2021 Jersey Census shows 45% of women aged 16-64 hold higher-level qualifications compared with 40% of men. Education reports about Jersey consistently show girls outperforming boys at GCSE level. Men account for about 68% of suicides in Jersey. Men make up the majority of those receiving treatment for drug misuse and this is concentrated among young adult males.
I'm 65 and my generation grew up in a very different world.
Housing was affordable. Careers were clearer. Manual jobs were plentiful. University was optional. You could leave school, learn a trade and, build a life.
Higher education is now the gateway to most careers. Around 65% of workers in finance and legal services hold higher-level qualifications. At the same time, many of the traditional pathways into adulthood that once existed for boys have faded. Modern classrooms also favour traits where girls tend to develop earlier. Boys, on average, mature later and often learn better through movement, experimentation and practical problem solving.
For most of history that wasn’t a problem, because boys had multiple pathways into adulthood. Many now simply disengage.
And the consequences extend. As education gaps widen, birth rates decline. Places like Jersey - with high housing costs and a highly competitive professional economy - are not immune.
This is not a gender war. But when large numbers of men lose purpose, they don't simply disappear. They withdraw. Or self-destruct. Youth offending (Jersey): Up 30-35% in the past three years, with most offences involving boys aged 13-17. Truancy (Jersey): Rose from 10% in 2022 to 14% in 2024, with boys aged .13-16 most affected. Under-25s are over-represented among those not in education, employment, or training, and young men are more likely to be unemployed or on income support.
For most of history masculinity was about responsibility. We stopped telling boys where they are needed.
My Comments
Low reading engagement is one of the strongest predictors of boys’ under‑achievement. Programmes that give boys material they actually enjoy (non‑fiction, graphic novels, practical topics) and build daily reading habits make a measurable difference.
Lessons that build in movement, hands‑on tasks, and problem‑solving (projects, experiments, outdoor learning, technical work) tend to re‑engage boys who switch off in purely desk‑based, talk‑heavy classrooms. This isn’t magic, but it’s one of the few things consistently recommended across reviews.
Boys are more likely to be excluded, sanctioned, or labelled rather than understood. Training staff to see behaviour as a signal, often of struggle with literacy, attention, or home stress, reduces exclusions and keeps boys in learning.
When apprenticeships, trades, and technical education are funded, respected, and clearly linked to real wages and progression, disengaged boys reappear. The World Bank’s review of male under‑achievement is blunt: credible labour‑market routes are one of the strongest protective factors for boys and young men.
Boys hear a lot about what’s wrong with men and very little about where they are genuinely needed: care work, teaching, youth work, fatherhood, craftsmanship, public service. Naming those as honourable, modern forms of masculinity matters.
For further reading:
https://www.menandboyscoalition.org.uk/boys-and-young-mens-education-toolkit
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/111041644611110155/pdf/Educational-Underachievement-Among-Boys-and-Men.pdf