http://www.sundayherald.com/news/heraldnews/display.var.2086677.0.home_truths.php?act=login
Harper and the Jersey police, to be certain they are carrying out their work correctly, they have voluntarily called in a review team from the UK mainland. The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) Working Group will review the investigation so far. With Jersey not being part of the United Kingdom and therefore not under Home Office jurisdiction, Harper is nevertheless keen to ensure his investigation is working by the book, even if it is someone else's.
Will someone explain how Acpo didn't spot anything wrong with the investigation? I read the JEP report tonight but was unable to find any mention of this!
1947: L'Êpreuve
-
*L'Êpreuve*
*Par J. L. M.*
*CHARACTETHES :*
Jim Déspres (un jeune fermi, nouvieau mathié), fils d'français ... Jack Le
Marquand
Liza Déspres ...
1 day ago
Posts
2 comments:
There are none so blind as those who will not see?
What is apparent is the missing evidence from this rebuttal - the victim's testimony, which does, or does not corroborate the 'facts'.
I hope the victims do not lose their voice, or representation because of this charade.
Charade it is due to the misrepresentation of Harper's statements; said misrepresentation then used to discredit Harper. In fact it is an educational example of a Straw Man argument, which does Warcup's team little credit for their argument.
What next? Personal attacks on Harper, and Power?
Post a Comment