Sunday, 15 July 2018

What is a Perpetual Curate?



















From "The Pilot", 1969, comes this, an interesting historical ramble.

The Revd Charles Dodgson was perpetual curate of All Saints’ Church, Daresbury in Cheshire. He was the father of C.L.Dodgson, otherwise known as Lewis Carroll.

Perpetual curacies had long been liable to remain poorly paid and inadequately housed relative to other full incumbencies of the Church of England, even when augmented from Queen Anne's Bounty; consequently the Perpetual Curate commonly features in mid-Victorian literary culture as a figure endeavouring to maintain the social standing of beneficed clergyman, but whose family aspirations (especially marital) were being frustrated by constricted financial expectations; most notably in The Perpetual Curate by Mrs Oliphant, and in The Last Chronicle of Barset by Anthony Trollope.

While not a "perpetual curate", the Minister of St Paul's Church in Jersey comes under a similar system, appointed and chosen by members of the lay congregation.

Some Church Customs Explained
By S.G. Thicknesse

What is a Perpetual Curate?


Most of the old churches of England were built by laymen, who endowed them with freehold land also sufficient for a graveyard, and sometimes for a parsonage house, and for a plot-the glebe-by which the rector could maintain himself for ever.

In addition, from the earliest centuries the parishioners brought annually to the tithe barn, or other convenient place, the tenth part of the yearly increment of their land, stock, and personal skill for the maintenance of their church and the clerk, or person, in holy orders who held it.

The right of nominating and presenting such a person to the living was clearly a valuable one. It was often handed down from father to son in the family of the original benefactor, or added to the dowry of a daughter, or sold, or given away as a pious act to a monastic foundation. Especially after the twelfth century it proved a very small step for such recipients to use their right to present to a living, if they were a monastic or other religious corporation, to nominate themselves to it in perpetuity.

By this legal fiction they were able to appropriate to the use of the house at least the valuable `great tithes' of the parish, those of corn, hay, grain, and wood, leaving the others, on other crops, on stock, and on personal skill, with freehold in church, etc., to the substitute whom they nominated-the vicar.

At the Dissolution such appropriated rectories, and the rights that went with them, in many cases fell into the hands of lay-men, the `gray coat parsons', where it still sometimes remains. Before the Reformation there were many spectacular cases of laymen holding clerical benefices, even bishoprics.

His Eminence Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, Archbishop of York, Abbot of St. Albans, and Bishop of Durham, secured for his natural son four archdeaconries, a deanery, five prebends and two rectories, and only failed to get him accepted as his successor in the fabulously rich see of Durham, although the young Thomas was not yet in priest's orders.

After the Reformation, however, if allowance is made for monastic wealth that came back into lay hands, the number of laymen living on what had been clerical benefits was greater than ever before.

Where such layman swallowed, impropriated, the vicarage tithes of the living, as well as the rectorial, the parson instituted to its shorn freehold was, and is, called a perpetual curate. He holds, as does every rector or vicar, a benefice and cure, or care, of souls. Rectors and vicars are also `curates'. Any unbeneficed clergyman who assists them, whether he be priest or deacon, is an assistant curate.

Before the middle of the nineteenth century it was quite often this assistant curate alone who was left to look after the parish. Realistic England therefore tended to drop the word `assistant' from his title.

Although there are far more parochial benefices in England than benefices of other types, there are also others, as for example those attached to cathedrals and collegiate churches. Some of these were served before the Reformation by monks, as at Durham, or by canons living together under a rule, as at Salisbury, but where such foundations survived they became `secular' at the dissolution.

A dean, for example, holds a cathedral benefice; so do those canons residentiary who have definite full-time or periodic duties to perform in the cathedral or collegiate church. The subdean is often a beneficed canon, as is also a precentor. The latter, the leader of the music, as his Latin name implies, traditionally holds the stall opposite and corresponding to that of the dean.

Between them they have supplied the names of the sides of the choir-decani, the side of the dean (decanus: originally a man set over ten); and cantoris, that of the precantor.

At first such beneficed canons were called prebendaries. This was because, about the tenth century, they tired of living together under a common roof and split up among themselves the prebend, the revenues of the foundation.

To-day, on the contrary, a prebendary, as at St. Paul's, tends to be an honorary, not a beneficed canon. Among the rights which he enjoys is a seat on the cathedral chapter.

Saturday, 14 July 2018

Fading Flowers at Sunset








There was an accident at La Pulente, down by the bend at the bottom and a man crashed his car and died. I went for a walk there on Friday evening, and on my way back, I spotted these flowers. And I thought: someone remembered, someone cared. That was the inspiration for this poem:

Fading Flowers at Sunset

One evening walk, I chanced to see
Flowers by the roadside, fading fast
At the bend in the road, beside a tree
Remember, they said, remember my past

A car comes along that winding road
And crashes: and there a man is dead
Now only flowers remain in this abode
Token of memory, that tears were shed

Flowers on a hot day: they wilt and fade
I see them in sunset, in the day’s goodbye
We wither and die, become a mere shade
Lost in the breeze in the pinky hued sky

I passed by the road, where the poor man had lain
And flowers will fade, but the love will remain

Friday, 13 July 2018

Jersey Airport - Part 5



















My history blog today comes from the 1980 edition of Aircraft Illustrated.

This is the final part of the article - the others can be read below:

http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2018/06/jersey-airport-part-1.html
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2018/06/jersey-airport-part-2.html
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2018/06/jersey-airport-part-3.html
http://tonymusings.blogspot.com/2018/07/jersey-airport-part-4.html

British Isles 'Airports: No 10 Jersey
by David H. Kirkman
(Flightlines International)














Dan-Air HS748 srs2, G-BEBA, parked on the main apron at the States of Jersey Airport; in the background can be seen the airport's control tower.

Jersey Airport is utilised by Air Atlantique as a base for DC-3 freight charter work. One of the airline's aircraft, G-ANAF, is seen here. 

BEA Vickers Vanguards were a familiar sight on services to Jersey in the early-1970s. 

Intra Airways Vickers Viscount, G-BDRC, taking-off from Jersey Airport and framing the general aviation apron and hangarage in the background. The operations of Intra Airways were taken over by Jersey European Airways in 1979. 

A significant addition to the fleet of recently-formed Jersey European Airways (the airline was founded a year ago on 1 November 1979 when it took over the activities of Express Air Services and Intra Airways), has been two Embraer Bandeirantes. The aircraft, registered G-BHJY and G-BHJZ (the example seen here), are employed on short-haul services to Northern France. 


British Midland Airways DC-9,G-BFIH Dovedale.


A foreign visitor, in the form of Trans European Airways Boeing 737, 00-TEH Marcus Johannes, on finals to States of Jersey Airport. 


Jersey Airport is an ideal venue for an air rally and every year a large number of light aircraft attend the event which is usually held in the first week of May. Piper Comanche, G-ARIE, heads this line-up of aircraft at the 1980 rally.














A frequent visitor to the States of Jersey Airport, is this colourful Aurigny Pilatus Britten-Norman BN-2A Trislander, G-AZU. Aurigny (the old French name for Alderney the airline's base) operates passenger and freight services within the Channel Islands linking Jersey, Guernsey and Alderney.

Thursday, 12 July 2018

Look A Like
















And now for Something Completely Different....

Murray Palin, ex-States member and the new Chief Executive at Jersey's Chamber of Commerce.











Its...

Michael Norton, ex-Python and lead actor in "Ripping Yarns"

Is it my imagination or does a recent picture of Murray Norton look like Michael Palin? Is there going to be a TV series "Around the Chamber of Commerce in 80 minutes"? Is there a dead parrot in their offices? I think we should be told.

Wednesday, 11 July 2018

The Locust Years














Jim Hacker: There's a vacancy for Deputy Secretary here. I shall appoint a woman. Sarah Harrison.

Sir Humphrey: The point is she's too young and it's not her turn.

Jim Hacker: I knew you'd say that! This is exactly what's wrong with the Civil Service - Buggins' turn! The best people should be promoted!

Sir Humphrey: Exactly! As soon as it's their turn!

Jim Hacker: Oh, nonsense! Napoleon ruled Europe when he was in his 30s! Alexander conquered the world in his 20s.

Sir Humphrey: They'd have made poor Deputy Secretaries.

Jim Hacker: They didn't wait their turn!

Sir Humphrey: And look what happened to them.

Jim Hacker: And look what's happened to us! Instead of being run by a lot of young, able, energetic men, this country's being run by tired, cynical 55-year-olds who just want a quiet life!

Sir Humphrey: Had you anyone specific in mind?

- Yes Minister


Listening to Charlie Parker passionately advocate change, everything he says is pretty accurate in the way the top echelons of the civil service work.

"The Chief Executive was nominally accountable for the public service, but had no actual authority over the departmental Chief Officers, as a result of the then corporate sole arrangements. Departments were fiefdoms in law, with a siloed mentality, which meant that there was no shared ambition, no shared accountability, no collective responsibility and little cross-cutting activity."

Finance was said to be a particular area of concern, following a review led by a finance consultant within his Transition Team. “This uncovered some systemic weaknesses, poor practices and a range of risks,” he reported.

“Departments were fiefdoms in law, with a siloed mentality, which meant that there was no shared ambition, no shared accountability, no collective responsibility and little cross-cutting activity. ‘This was not only a barrier to effective planning and decision-making for the public service, but it led to wasteful duplication, inconsistency and competition between departments.”

So why had nothing taken place under the two previous Chief Executives of the States?

Bill Ogley was brought in as someone with expertise in managing change, just as Ministerial government was coming in, and the mantra, as we heard so often, was that there was to be a new era of “joined up government”. In 2004,. Everything seemed positive. As the JEP reported at the time:

“The results of a month-long exercise by senior civil servants on the future of States departments are being made known to workers and politicians and will be made public on Wednesday. The 'visioning' exercise has been led by the corporate management board under the leadership of Policy and Resources chief executive Bill Ogley. P & R president Senator Frank Walker has promised that the results will signal 'a revolution' in the way that the public sector operates.Fifteen civil service managers were seconded from their jobs to work on the report for 20 days earlier this year.”

“Their findings are likely to have an impact both on the level of staffing across the States sector and on how departments work with each other.The 'visioning' exercise comes at a time when the public sector has never been under such close examination before.”

But the vision faded. The Brave New World of Bill Ogley turned into a chimera, which was as frustrating for him as for anyone else. As he explained later:

“Each States’ Department Chief Officer’s reporting line had been described as being direct to me, as one would have expected in a large English local authority or indeed in a civil service department. However, in fact the Chief Officers reported both to their respective Ministers and also to myself. This duplication left a significant lack of clarity in respect of supervision and accountability. This was the result of a States Assembly decision, and certain politicians in particular, to ensure that the politicians remained in control. The result was that neither the Chief Executive nor the respective Minister had the requisite power, as had been anticipated when the revised government structure was originally devised.”

“The main problem, from my perspective, was that I was in a position where I was accountable for the Chief Officers, but without those officers’ reporting lines being to me.”

Having had uprooted his family from the UK to live in Jersey and with his children at secondary schools in Jersey, leaving was not an immediate option, and instead he had to settle for second best: “I considered that had no real choice but to get on with things as best that I could and work within the confines of the structures as they were”

Finally Bill Ogley decided that enough was enough, and invoked a clause allowing him to leave when he wanted to. This itself was a reflection on the inability of the Chief Minister, Terry Le Sueur, to exercise anything remotely like solid political oversight. A degree of slackness from the Chief Minister meant that Bill Ogley’s resignation came as a surprise, and evidently the conflict between Mr Ogley and Senator Ozouf was left alone on the basis that it would go away of its own accord. Instead, Mr Ogley left of his own accord, and with a considerable “golden handshake” – a clause in his contract which had been witnessed by Senator Le Sueur.

After Bill Ogley left, John Richardson took over the top job. Kevin Keen was brought in to try and improve matters and he certainly exposed the dysfunctional nature of government, with the silo mentalities described recently by Charlie Parker. But he had no real power to effect change, and rather than being sucked in and becoming part of the problem, he left to take his troubleshooting skills elsewhere.

Matters stagnated because there was very little drive from the top for change. In a recent comment, John Henwood laid at least a substantial part of the blame on Richardson’s shoulders:

“Mr Parker's predecessor in the role was a career Jersey Civil Servant and when it came to managing change he didn't have any tools in the toolbox other than those he acquired during 35 years working his way up the greasy pole to the top. So, not entirely his fault because the only way he knew was the way that had been perpetuated for so long. It's was a case of "Buggin's turn" when it came to promotion and so poorly qualified people achieved ever more senior roles and when it was discovered they were not up to the task in hand they weren't moved out as they should have been, but left in place and excuses made for failings. And who is to blame? The policy makers, the people we elected to sort things out, but didn't. Now Mr Parker has the unenviable task of sorting out years of mismanagement, poor decision making and passing the parcel when things went wrong.”

One of the reasons Ian Gorst, as Chief Minister, was so keen to put accountability by Chief Officers directly to the Chief Executive was precisely because without it, Charlie Parker would have effectively been neutralised just as Bill Ogley was.

Churchill spoke of the situation before the Second World War as the “years the locusts ate”, years where government “decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity, all powerful to be impotent.”

And his words could just as easily apply to the dysfunctional public service which Charlie Parker is now trying to reform:

“Want of foresight, unwillingness to act when action would be simple and effective, lack of clear thinking, confusion of counsel until the emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong—these are the features which constitute the endless repetition of history.”

Tuesday, 10 July 2018

Terms of Reference: Hospital Project













Terms of Reference

Russell Labey has put in a proposition for 10 July:

“to request the Minister for the Environment to redraft the Terms of Reference for the forthcoming Public Inquiry into the new application for the Jersey Future Hospital, as outlined in his letter of 17th May 2018 to the Independent Inspector, to provide the Inquiry with the freedom and latitude to consider alternative sites, if deemed necessary and appropriate.”

His argument is that the decision to consider whether the States should look elsewhere should not, as with the previous Inspector’s Terms of Reference, be constrained to rule out the possibility of alternative sites:

"An Inspector of the experience and qualification of the appointee here will be fully cognisant of his role, and that it does not extend to choosing the site for Jersey’s new Hospital. He may wish to rule out representations or testimony that stray into the territory of site selection, alternative locations and the “brief”, but that should be a decision for him to make without prescription from the Minister or anyone else.”

And the rationale for that is that where a plan breaches existing policies within the Island Plan, he should ensure that other sites might result in a lesser impact or be better suited for development:

“In a scenario where considering whether permission should be granted for this application on this particular site, the Inspector finds that the application would require exceptions to be made to policies of the Island Plan because of non-compliance he should – before reaching a recommendation that this application be approved – consider the available evidence from the applicant and objectors and form an opinion on whether suitable alternative sites for the development have been considered sufficiently to justify such exception to the Island Plan policies in the public interest.”

Deputy Labey makes it very clear that he does not require the Inspector to re-examine the entire site selection process or to look at alternative sites, but it leaves it open to the Inspector to judge whether they should look at the alternatives rather than having that ruled out by the terms of Reference.

Terms of reference are often a key matter when it comes to any kind of inquiry, and quite often the government tries to get away with as narrow terms as they can do so. Nowhere is this seen as plainly as in the chronology of the events leading up to the Independent Inquiry into Historical Child Abuse.

One of the first reviews on deficiencies in public child care was the Williamson report but his brief was very clearly laid out so that it did not materially include Operation Rectangle and the historical allegations of abuse concerned in Operation Rectangle. The argument was that his report was intended to look forwards, rather than backwards, and consider only current practice.

The Napier report into the handling of suspension of the Police Chief Graham Power was not only heavily restricted, and Brian Napier’s remit did not include access to “in camera” debates on the matter, but also managed to lose part (d) to “would review all information relating to the original suspension procedure, including relevant sections of the published Affidavit from the suspended Chief Officer of Police.”

According to Chief Minister Terry Le Sueur, this was a mistake and part of the document was lost in when the details were forwarded to the Greffe for printing and the subsequent publication. It appears this may not have affected the outcome of the review anyway, but it certainly was typical of the sloppy processes which took place under the Chief Minister’s oversight, and the publication of the report itself was delayed for three weeks until a threat of a private member’s proposition got it into the public domain.

The Care Inquiry itself was a massive undertaking, and having conferred with the parties involved, Veritas drew up terms of reference. For some reason, this did not seem acceptable to the Council of Ministers, and so Andrew Williamson was called upon to provide an alternative Terms of Reference, perhaps one that did not, as the final version following Veritas did, consider everything up to and including Operation Rectangle.:

“Review the actions of the agencies of the government, the justice system and politicians during the period under review, in particular when concerns came to light about child abuse and establish what, if any, lessons are to be learned.”

Instead, as Andrew Williamson was brought on board, the government statement said: “It has been important to develop clear terms of reference that will be effective and provide help with closure, but not subjecting witnesses to the potential of undue cross examination in a Committee of Inquiry which would result in all parties having to receive legal representation. This has required careful consideration of the original terms of reference before being submitted to the States for approval.”

The Verita report said the terms of reference should be wide:

“The period to be covered is primarily 1960 to 2005. However, we drafted the terms of reference with scope to consider the post-war period because abuse victims from that period are still alive. We suggest that the inquiry considers the organisation and supervision of services, how complaints of abuse were dealt with and what the government could learn from their handling of the matter following the events in 2008.”

Williamson’s review said:

“To convene an independent Committee of Inquiry to look at the decisions taken by both political and senior management of the Children’s Services in Jersey during the period 1960 to 1994 with particular reference to the standards of care provided to children in the care system.”

And while it did cover Operational Rectangle, it was very narrow it its remit:

“To commission a review of the decisions taken whether or not to prosecute individuals identified during the police enquiry concerning the various allegations that culminated in the enquiry into Haut la Garenne. This can be undertaken by a lawyer, not resident in Jersey, and should be a review of the legal evidence available at that time.”

The Williamson brief was scuppered however by the leak onto a blog of the complete terms of Verita calling into question why any items would be dropped. It is not clear behind the scenes who would have been pressing for the Verita terms to be dropped, in particular those relating to the handling of matters by the government following the events in 2008, but a reading of the inquiry final report and the names of those criticised severely probably gives a clue.

This brief summary shows by way of examples how terms and conditions can be used to derail proper investigation or evaluations by removing wider questions from the realm of possibility. Will this happen with the hospital planning inspector's remit? We will have to wait and see.

Monday, 9 July 2018

Land for School: Grab or Greed?












Coming up in the States is the proposition concerning the compulsory purchase of Field No. 85, the majority of Field No. 84 and the majority of Field No. 80, La Rue Carrée, St. Brelade. The proposition gives something of the history:

“On 18th December 2015, Jersey Property Holdings wrote to the various parties’ landowners that it wished agree to purchase their relevant land by negotiation, in a timely and orderly manner, at a prevailing market value price. It has always been the preference when acquiring land by the Public to do so by agreement, rather than resort to compulsory purchase powers (where available). However, in that communication, Jersey Property Holdings was obliged to advise the recipients that the importance of the project meant that if a negotiated agreement was not possible the fall-back position, as a last resort, was compulsory purchase.”

“Jersey Property Holdings has therefore endeavoured to pursue a strategy of acquisition by negotiation. Following negotiations between the parties and their respective agents, consistent purchase considerations were agreed with all freehold interest owners based on a value of £15,000 per vergée.”

“It has been agreed with the owner of Fields 80, 84 and 85 that the value of the land is £194,100 (One Hundred and Ninety-Four Thousand, One Hundred Pounds). During the negotiations it became apparent that it would be necessary to agree further terms with the owner owing to the possible diminution in value, the owner’s retained land/buildings would suffer as a result of the newly-developed School; taking into account a number of factors (including the effect on value of the residential unit currently on the retained land, and also any future redevelopment potential of the retained land that would be impacted by the School development).”

In other words, said fields were part of a wider potential development with land owned that was not under consideration for compulsory purchase. The closeness of the site to Les Ormes may suggest what might be in the owner’s mind, although as the fields are part of the Green zone, there would be a presumption against development. The case of the school was a special circumstance in the provision for the public interest with no realistic alternatives.

A number of land transactions, such as the land at St Ouen with a bunker, and the sale of a green field business near to Red Houses, have taken place recently, and it is clear that at least some people think that as the Island Plan is due for review, there may be more potential for Green Zone land on the fringes of built up areas.

“A valuation was carried out by a third party on instruction from the owner, which was carried out in accordance with the RICS Valuation Professional Standards (the ‘Red Book’). The valuation ascertained the diminution in value to the retained property (comprising land and buildings) as being £58,900 (Fifty-Eight Thousand, Nine Hundred Pounds). This was accepted by Jersey Property Holdings.”

“Heads of Terms were signed with the owner, dated 7th December 2017. In accordance with Standing Order 168(1)(a), the Minister for Infrastructure agreed, as recommended by Jersey Property Holdings, for the Public to acquire Fields 85, 84 (part) and 80 (part) (MD-PH-2017-0055). The decision was made on 16th December 2017. A date was proposed by the Public to complete the acquisition before Court (namely 26th January 2018).”

“On 14th February 2018, communication on behalf of the Owner was received, the effect of which was to seek to renegotiate the major terms pertaining to the acquisition, including the consideration agreed, and to further seek to include a number of conditions on the future use of the land.”

“These new terms were a material departure from the signed Heads of Terms. In the opinion of Jersey Property Holdings, the agreed Heads of Terms are a fair and true reflection of the amount which the land might have been expected to realise if sold on the open market by a willing seller”

As the JEP reported:

“The owner of three of the eight fields where the school is to be built increased his sale price from £194,000 to £4 million.”

That is quite a hefty increase, especially as the “Red Book” valuation was carried out on instructions from the owner.

The JEP also ays that:

“Dave Carrel, who inherited the green-zone sites, later claimed in statement from his lawyers that he was being ‘bullied’ into selling off the land for less than it was worth – something the States denies.”

Reading between the lines, it seems that it was when his lawyers became involved that the price jumped up so significantly.

The case for bullying is that compulsory purchase was mentioned at the outset, so it was effectively like a loaded gun at the owners to negotiate a fair price, or else... That is probably the line which will be taken in the States by those opposing compulsory purchase: that the sale was forced for a price under duress.

On the other hand Mr Carrel’s own land was subject to an independent valuation, where the valuer was not instructed in any way to come up with a lower valuation based on that presumption, and indeed it is hard to see how they could be. So I don’t think the duress argument stands up well, precisely because further steps were taken to ensure an independent valuation. To suggest otherwise would surely be to impugn the integrity of the valuer acting in accord with RICS Valuation Professional Standards. If not such valuation had taken place, the argument for duress would be stronger, as it is, it falls away as irrelevant.

It is, I think, a very Jersey trait to hold onto land and to be quite stubborn and change your mind – even if you have already agreed and signed heads of terms. To my mind, but I’m old fashioned, if you sign something it is like giving your word, and to decide at the 11th hour that you’ve changed your mind may be possible.

I was involved in a land transaction with an old Jerseyman, who on the day land was to change hands in court, decided that if extra boundary stones were not inserted that morning, the transactions would not take place that afternoon. And he had already managed to squeeze more land for himself out of the transaction by moving some boundaries within the last week, although not as much as he first wanted. Masquerading as self-interest, there was certainly a strong element of greed.

Whether that is the case here is for others to decide, but to sign and change your mind is at the very least dishonourable, and if Mr Carrel gets the odd brickbat thrown at him by the general public, it is perhaps not altogether unsurprising.

Sunday, 8 July 2018

Faith of Our Fathers – Part 7












The local historian G.R. Balleine was also a clergyman, and in 1940, at the outbreak of the Second World War, he penned a series of 52 lessons around the Apostle’s Creed. Balleine being first a foremost a historian, there’s a lot of history there that I’ve never come across before, and I have studied church history quite a lot.

He’s also master of the pithy anecdote or illustration to bring something to life, which is why Frank Falle says the original history, flowing freely, is a better book to read that its more worthy revisions. Joan Stevens was a fair historian, but she could not write nearly as well as Balleine, who has an almost intimate chatty style.

I’m hoping to put some or all of this book online on Sundays.

Faith of Our Fathers – Part 7
By GR Balleine


LESSON V.

The Birth of Jesus.

Jesus Christ, Born of the Virgin Mary.

PASSAGE TO BE READ : St. Luke ii. 1-20.

TEXT TO BE LEARNT : " For your Sakes He became poor, that ye through His poverty might become rich " (2 Cor. viii. 9).

AIM : To give a fresh and vivid presentation of the Christmas story.


HYMNS : " Once in royal David's city," and " While shepherds watched."

APPARATUS: Map to show Bethlehem. Christmas pictures. Model of an Eastern inn.: HoslEwoRR :
HOMEWORK: Write a letter from the stable-boy of Bethlehem describing the first Christmas night.

THOUGHT FOR TEACHERS:

Great Little One, Whose all-embracing birth
Lifts earth to Heaven, stoops Heaven to earth.
-R. Crashaw.

1. THE WEARY TRAVELLERS.

(a) One evening nineteen centuries ago two travellers were toiling up the steep hill to Bethlehem, Joseph, a carpenter from the north and and his newly married girl-wife, Mary. Bethlehem stands 2,500 feet above sea-level. It is called a " city," but that only means that it was surrounded by a wall. In size it was no larger than many an English village.

(b) The sun was sinking toward the waters of the distant Mediterranean, and the travellers were forced to hurry. If  they arrived after sunset, the city gates would be closed. Mary was so tired that she could hardly sit on her donkey, and Joseph had to support her as he trudged b y her side. At last they passed the gates, and reached the inn, hoping to find rest. An Eastern inn is very unlike an English one. Picture an open courtyard, with a well in the middle, surrounded by a high wall. On the inner side of the wall are arches, and over these bare little rooms, approached by a stone stair. The rooms are for rich visitors. Poor ones sleep in the arches. The mules and camels lie in the yard. The inn-keeper's room is over the arch which leads into the courtyard.

 (c) Let us imagine that the Bethlehem inn-keeper had a little son called Levi. All day Levi had been helping his father. It was the busiest day that he had ever known, for a census ordered by the Roman Government had brought crowds to Bethlehem. To please the Jews the Romans had allowed everyone to be enrolled in his family town, and Bethlehem was " the city of David." Other families might be slack, and not care where they were enrolled, but descendants of the Kings were proud of their lineage, and made a point of being registered in the royal city. So all day strangers had been pouring into Bethlehem, intent on proving their descent from David.

(d) Fortunately for Levi, visitors did not expect anything but shelter and water. They spread their own rugs on the floor for a bed. They lit their own fires in the courtyard, and cooked their own meals. Yet even so he was very busy.

By midday every room was let. By nightfall every arch was full. Then, just as the city gates were closing, came another knock. It was Joseph and Mary. Levi looked out. "Very sorry. We have no room." He was going to slam the door, when he caught sight of Mary's sweet tired face, and paused. " Do find us somewhere to lie down," said Joseph; " We have been travelling for three days, and my wife can go no farther."

(e) The boy thought a minute. "There is no room here to lie down even in the courtyard ; but we have a cave that we use as a stable. If you care to follow me, I will lead you to it, and you can sleep there." (Ancient Christian tradition is unanimous that our Lord was born in a cave. The Church of the Nativity is built over a cave 40 ft. long, 16 ft. broad, 10 ft. high. Many caves round Bethlehem are still used as stables.) It was very dark, very dirty, cold and full of cattle. Yet it was better than the open air, and Joseph thanked the boy, and took Mary inside.

II. THE NEW-BORN BABY.

(a) In the middle of the night Levi was awakened by another knock. " Surely," he said, " no travellers can have got into the city at this hour ! " By moonlight he recognized Joseph. " Can you lend me a basin with some warm water ? My wife has just had a Baby Boy, and we want to bathe Him." Levi flew for his mother, and she hurried to the cave to help.

(b) Levi carried a lantern to light her to the stable. They found Mary lying on some straw, which Joseph had arranged for her, and in her arms the sweetest little Baby that Levi had ever seen. When He was bathed, Mary took from her bundle a long strip of linen, and wound it tightly round and round the Baby, beginning at his toes, and ending at his neck, untill He looked like a little mummy, and was unable to move either arms or legs. Mothers quite mistakenly thought that these swaddling bands were necessary. The Baby was already beginning to suffer from the ignorance of the people around.

 (c) Where could a cradle be found ? The only thing handy  was a manger, the long earthen trough into which fodder was put for the cattle. And there

 Away in a manger, no crib for a bed,
 The little Lord Jesus laid down His sweet head.
The stars in the bright sky looked down where He lay,
The little Lord Jesus asleep on the hay.

 III. THE SHEPHERDS.

(a) It was light before Levi returned to the inn, but he did not go to bed yet. He saw hurrying from cave to cave a group of shepherds. The Jews in New Testament days regarded shepherds much as we regard gipsies. They were the roughest men they knew. They spent most of their lives in the wilderness far from Synagogue or Temple. They could not keep the Sabbath. They could not live like ordinary villagers. The Rabbis said that no shepherd could be saved.

(b) These shepherds had been guarding their flock on the hills outside Bethlehem, and in the night they had seen a vision of angels. First one angel had appeared saying that he brought them "tidings of great joy." For centuries the Jews had been expecting the coming of a great Deliverer, Whom they called the Messiah or the Christ. Perhaps the shepherds had been discussing whether the Christ would be born in  their days. The angel's news was that the Christ had been born that night in Bethlehem-" Unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour Who is the Christ, the Lord " : and the sign by which they might know Him was that He would be found in a manger. Then the sky seemed full of angels singing, " Glory to God in the highest."

(c) As soon as the gates opened, the shepherds hurried into Bethlehem, and began to search the stables to see which manger had a new-born baby in it. When Levi heard what
 They were were hunting for, he led them with pride to his stable. Mary and Joseph were astonished at their visit and so were the people of Bethlehem, for " they made known abroad the saying which was told them concerning this Child." The people "wondered," but they did not believe.  If the High Priest or the Ruler of the Synagogue had seen such a vision, the people might have been impressed,
but it seemed incredible that so important a truth would be revealed to mere shepherds. In a few weeks the incident was forgotten, but " Mary kept all these sayings, and pondered them in her heart," and I do not think Levi forgot them. Perhaps later he became one of our Lord's disciples.

IV. APPLICATION.

(a) Life may begin in deepest poverty, and yet produce the greatest and most beneficial results. No life has ever been such a blessing to the world as the life of Jesus, yet no tramp's baby was ever born in more miserable surroundings. Never say, Because I am poor, I cannot do much with my life. Think of Jesus, Who was born in a stable, and yet became the world's greatest Leader.

(b) God's best blessings often lie close to our doors unrecognized. There were seven or eight hundred people in Bethlehem, but we do not read that any but the shepherds came to visit Jesus. Hundreds prayed night and morning for the Messiah to be born, yet, when He was born, none of them came near Him or did anything to help His cause.'

(c) The Ruler of the Synagogue might have grumbled, Why did not God send me a vision ? God can only lead those who are willing to be led. The ignorant shepherds were leadable, and so God led them. The Bethlehemites had their minds so full of other things-perhaps the problem whether they would be able to make good their claim to be reckoned as members of the most aristocratic family in Israel -that they never noticed that the air was full of angels. God will lead, if we will listen ; but He can do nothing, if our minds are already fully occupied.

Saturday, 7 July 2018

Midnight Garden











Largely inspired by the lateness of the hour, and the wonderful book by Philippa Pearce

Midnight Garden

Midnight and chimes begin to ring
The grandfather clock strikes thirteen
A door opening into a world unseen
Times past and present together bring

The past holds firm, remains to cling
A garden lost in time, what has been
Midnight and chimes begin to ring
The grandfather clock strikes thirteen

Into the garden, a girl upon a swing
Flower beds, walls, a wondrous scene
Dreams of the past, what can it mean?
Time unfolds like a coiled spring
Midnight and chimes begin to ring

Friday, 6 July 2018

Jersey Airport - Part 4















My history blog today comes from the 1980 edition of Aircraft Illustrated.

British Isles 'Airports: No 10: Jersey
by David H. Kirkman
(Flightlines International)


It was British Airways' 5 October 1979 announcement of the abandonment of 26 of its domestic UK routes which prompted the most recent series of changes in the organisation of air services to Jersey, the BA withdrawal taking effect at the end of March 1980. Among the operators acquiring the former BA routes serving Jersey was JEA, which acquired, for example, the licence to operate to Newcastle.

Newly evident in 1980 (at Jersey as elsewhere) has been the Air UK presence, the airline having been launched in January this year. Among its routes to Jersey are those from Glasgow. Exeter, Bournemouth and Southampton, and included in the ex-British Airways services acquired in April 1980 was the Edinburgh-Jersey route.

The States of Jersey Airport is more than just a transit point for passengers en-route to the island's sunshine and its beaches, or for the freighting of the famous Jersey cows and horticultural produce. The airport also sports a thriving, vigorous aero club situated on the south-east boundary. It provides good hangarage and training facilities and is in fact a Civil Aviation Authority-approved flying school.

Starting with modest means, and Auster equipment, in 1952, the Channel Islands Aero Club hosts a major rally and fly-in at the airport each May. Probably the largest international air rally now held in Europe, every year about 150-200 aircraft converge on the tiny island from all over the UK and Europe to take part. A remarkable degree of skill and dexterity is exhibited by the air traffic control staff in handling this vast influx amid all the regular passenger and freight traffic.

The home of civil aviation in Jersey has moved from that tidal strip in St Aubin's Bay to a major UK airport having international status in a turbulent and interrupted 45 years. There appears every reason that the island will remain a popular tourist centre for the future and that aviation in the area will progress with the continued blend of commercial and general aviation activity that marks the local scene - from airline operations to air rallys.

Acknowledgement

The Author would like to thank Mr R. Peebles, Assistant Director – Airport Administration, States of Jersey Airport, and Servisair, ground handling specialists at Jersey, for their help and co-operation in the preparation of this article.


Thursday, 5 July 2018

Midsummer Maypole in Jersey



















I saw this in a field in St Brelade’s Bay and wondered what it was. Apparently it is part of a pagan celebration of Midsummer, although I’d not come across it in the traditions I am familiar with. That is not perhaps surprising because it is not a Celtic or Druidic pagan custom, or part of the Western Mysteries traditions, but an import from Sweden that has  been appropriated by modern pagan groups.

I should note that there is nothing wrong with adapting rituals of this kind to celebrate an event, as long of course that it does not involve any inappropriate cultural appropriation. In this case, the maypole itself is (as we shall see) not an indigenous Swedish custom but itself an import.

This tradition of what might be called a “Midsummer Maypole” is called midsommarstÃ¥ng.

Byron J. Nordstrom in his book “Culture and Customs of Sweden” describes how it is constructed and used:

“Maypoles are typically like a ship’s mast with one or two cross-spars from which wreaths may be hung. They are wrapped with green branches, and some include floral elements, colorful ribbons, and the like. After decoration, they are ceremonially erected and dancing takes place around them, typically to traditional local fiddle music. This is a time when folk dance groups perform in costume.” 














In Sweden, Midsummer's Eve and Midsummer's Day used to be celebrated on 23 June and 24 June, but since 1953 the celebration has been fixed to a weekend. It takes place on the nearest Friday and Saturday between 19 June and 26 June with the main celebrations taking place on Friday. 

It is one of the most important holidays of the year in Sweden. 













Johanna Stapelberg explains how the day unfolds:

“The day starts off at noon by gathering friends and family in the nearest park or in the archipelago to enjoy a small picnic. The maypole is raised in the middle of the park and the trick here is to not let the it fall the first time, as it means bad luck for the rest of the year. After the pole is up, the tradition is to dance around the pole, and the community may organize the first dance with people wearing traditional clothes leading a choreographed performance; then everyone is invited to join in together!”

“Later in the afternoon, it’s time for a long lunch. This special day has of course its own Swedish specialties when it comes to the cuisine! Typical Swedish dishes include marinated salmon with dill potatoes and chives or sour cream and/or toast skagen, a toast with prawns or shrimps. The drinks are also very special and the most important part to remember is the schnapps. Schnapps are a special drink that is often introduced with a song around the table.”

“When the evening enters, most people celebrate with drinks outside if the weather allows it and the night does not end until the next morning. But not to forget one of the most important traditions, especially for the younger children, is to collect seven different flowers and put them under their pillow so they can dream about the love of their life.”

What is clear is that the tradition was dying out when it was revived as part of the Romantic movement in Sweden in the late 19th century. This Romantic movement, as also in Britain, was a backlash against the increased drive towards urban life in cities and away from the countryside, and as in England, this was aggravated by enclosure acts.

Arnold Barton , writing in “Sweden and Visions of Norway: Politics and Culture, 1814-1905” notes that with this revival:

“Middle-class persons now proudly wore folk dress on appropriate, including patriotic, occasions, and joined folk dance groups. The traditional Midsummer festivities with dancing around the maypole decorated with leaves and flowers, which had fallen into disuse in much of rural Sweden, were now revived in all their glory.”

That explains why the origins of the Swedish maypole are usually described as pagan, and there are those who claim it is pre-Christian and is a heathen tradition and phallic fertility symbol. This is a common occurrence when much of the history behind customs has been forgotten, and it was not helped by Frazer's "Golden Bough" which mistakenly saw pagan vestiges in almost every older custom, and was extremely popular. It still exerts a baneful influence on popular culture.

Ronald Hutton notes in his "Stations of the Sun":

"C. W. von Sydow made a close study of Swedish customs (which had been important to Mannhardt) and discovered absolutely no trace of a belief in an indwelling spirit. Instead he found that the poles, like the fetching of green branches, were simply signs that the happy season of warmth and comfort hadreturned. They were useful frameworks upon which garlands and other decorations could be hung, to form a focal point for celebration."

The real history is more mundane, and it is of more recent origin than ancient times. As Annika Hipple explains:

“The maypole is a comparatively new part of Swedish Midsummer tradition. It came to Sweden in the late Middle Ages from Germany, where the pole was decorated with leaves and raised on May 1 (hence the name). Since spring comes later to Sweden it was hard to find the greenery to decorate the pole on May 1, so the tradition was moved to Midsummer.”

Wednesday, 4 July 2018

Journeys of Discovery

"The theory is, if you're separated from yourself, you start walking and you keep walking until you meet yourself. Then you sit down, and you have a long talk. Talk about everything that you've learned, everything that you've felt, and you talk until you've run out of words. Now, that's vital, because the real important things can't be said. And then, if you're lucky, you look up, and there's just you. Then you can go home”
-- Doctor Franklin, Babylon 5


I’ve recently been enjoying two different kinds of journey on “Book of the Week” on BBC Radio 4. But there are commonalities. Both writers are determined to set out on a journey of discovery, and it is as much an interior journey and an exterior one. The Socratic injunction - "know thyself" - is never far away.

I remember Bishop John Tayor back in the 1980s saying how wonderful travel was, even if a long flight left you jet-lagged, but the disadvantage of our speedy world was that we brought so much of ourselves with us. By way of contrast, he cites Captain Cook who on his year long journey on the Endeavour, would have acclimatised more to the changing world so that he could see it through fresh eyes. How much more true this is today, when we hardly go anywhere without the technology to keep us connected to our virtual world.

And yet we are also poorer because of it. When I go for a walk, albeit not a massively long one, I don’t glance at my phone, I don’t listen to music on my earphones. If I did, what would be the point of the walk? I might as well be at the gym on a treadmill. A walk, or any journey where there is time taken to pause, to breath, is to open our eyes to the world around us in new and unexpected ways.

These are narratives of two journeys where the writers did just that.













The Stopping Places by Damian Le Bas

Summary


Damian Le Bas inhabits an awkward middle ground between the non-gypsy world and his own traveller / gypsy heritage. He grew up in West Sussex in a house built by his grandfather on land the family owned, surrounded by a field that was half car-breaking business, half farmyard. Scattered bits of engines lay alongside bales of hay, brand new trucks were surrounded by geese and terriers. But twice a week they drove an hour each way to their family pitch in the market square of Petersfield where they sold flowers.

Along the way, his elders would nod towards lay-bys and verges, naming them as they passed. These were the 'atchin tans' or stopping places. His great grandmother, Nan, explained to him that they were the places where she and her family used to live in the days of wagons and bender tents. Sometimes they would stop for a few days, other times for a few years.

Damian's parents both had faith in education and, when they saw that he was bright, he applied for for a full scholarship at the nearby boarding school - Christ's Hospital - which led to ten grade A O-Levels, A Levels and theology at Oxford.

Damian was now firmly an outsider in both worlds. But having plundered the Bodleian Library for histories of gypsies, he felt the need to get out into the world and discover the topography of his ancestors. So he with his Nan's blessing he set out to visit the stopping places, sometimes alone and sometimes accompanied by his wife Candis. As we follow his journey, we also learn about the history of the gypsies and their marginalised place in society today.

Commentary

This book is all about finding roots, in this case, by going along well-travelled routes! But the world as described by Le Bas’ nan is not quite the world of today, or even of his own memory or imagination, and sometimes what was bathed in a summer sun of a golden past turns out more mundane and not quite as how he expected. It is an interesting book, exploring both Gypsy heritage (as handed down to him) and the journey that they would have taken in the old days, on the open road. The two strands weave together like a tapestry.

This book is one of the few to explore Romany culture from the insider’s perspective, from the point of view of someone of Gypsy stock, but that is not to denigrate some of the better studies from the past. “Gypsies of Britain: An Introduction to Their History” by Brian Vesey Fitzgerald is still, in my view, an excellent study of Romany culture, taboo, customs etc in Britain particularly around the 1920s and 1930s and in the revised edition up to the 1950s and early 1960s.

This is a mental journey as much as a physical journey, but on the way, the past is brought vividly to life. We are physical human beings, and sometimes to search for roots needs to follow footsteps of our ancestors, so that we can see things as they are now, and overlay what they saw then. 













The Crossway by Guy Stagg

Summary


An epic journey, but also an intimate one. After several years of mental illness, Guy Stagg set off one morning, from London, to walk to Canterbury. Ill-prepared and not entirely clear why he was doing this, he nevertheless got there. Exhausted, he lay beneath the Cathedral walls and then decided to continue. A few months later, on New Year's Day, 2013, he set out from Canterbury to follow the paths of the medieval pilgrims to Jerusalem.

Ten months and 5,500 kilometres later, he arrived.

This is the story of his walk. Danger and physical hardship lay in his path but he was also haunted by the memories that he sought to flee and ambushed by echoes of his breakdown.

In five extracts from his account, this reading follows some of his experiences through snow and storm across the Alps, among other pilgrims in Italy, despairing and alone in Greece, and finally to the incessant rounds of competing worship in Jerusalem.

It's a journey through the pathways of faith and recovery towards healing and understanding.

Commentary

This is another kind of journey, a search in part for healing and meaning, and at times, with almost a reckless attitude to safety and his own life, especially when crossing the alps during the onset of a snow storm.

On the way, we meet his fellow travellers, also on pilgrimage, but what pilgrimage means depends on the pilgrim. Some do it to keep fit, some to make a political protest, and some to seek some kind of penance to absolve them. Guy Stagg has no belief, and he clearly hopes for some kind of resolution to his mental illness and depression, and the feeling that he is an outsider beset by his own personal demons.

One remarkable fact which he keeps coming back to is the kindness of strangers. All sorts of people give him food and water and a bed for the night, without any agenda except to help those on a pilgrim way, and just be kind. Simple generosity like this is found all along his path, until he reaches Jerusalem, and for the first time, comes across bolted doors and religious exclusion.

In the end, he leaves Jerusalem, with its busy streets, its churches and mosques segregated into a multitude of territorial religious groups, and its tourist traps to go out into the hills, into the wilderness.

Much like the old aboriginal ritual of walkabout, he said: “I walked to mend myself.”

Tuesday, 3 July 2018

A Decline in the Honorary Police: Markers of a Wider Trend










"A CHANGING work culture is the biggest challenge facing the honorary police as it struggles to find new recruits, according to long-serving St Helier Centenier Danny Scaife. Mr Scaife, who is also the chairman of the honorary police chiefs’ committee, said that people were working more irregular hours, which made fitting in honorary police duties more difficult. "

‘Over the last five to ten years, it has become more problematic,’ he said. ‘The changing work culture certainly is a problem.’ He suggested that more people were working long hours and odd shifts, as technology changed how people worked. ‘Some bosses are very supportive and very good about allowing employees to take time off for honorary police duties or training and that’s good, but otherwise it is a challenge,’ he said.

(JEP 02/07/2018)


I think what Danny Scaife says is part of the issue, but it is not the whole one. If you look at declining church attendances, and then a declining in formal volunteering in general, I think it indicates a wider cultural trend.It's not just to do with time taken off from work.

Back in 2010, Alan Travis, writing in the Guardian, noted that in the UK:

“Charitable giving and volunteering has declined in England over the past five years despite official attempts to encourage both, according to the annual citizenship survey. The findings show that only 26% of people in England in 2008/09 took part in formal volunteering at least once a month, compared with 29% in 2005.”

The same trend can also be observed across the water in the USA, where the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2015, showed that: “The volunteering rate has slowly dwindled from 29 percent to 25.4 percent in just 10 years. It’s clear that Americans are volunteering less, both in numbers and hours.”

Moving forward to 2017 in the UK, and David Aisnworth reported that:

“Volunteering levels have declined by 15 per cent over a decade, according to Office for National Statistics figures published today. Over the same period, the population grew by 7.8 per cent, meaning the average number of hours volunteered by each person fell by 21.5 per cent over the 10 year period. “

And this year, Joy Williams noted that:

“While volunteering remains common in Britain, using many different measures, the consensus is that there has been a drop in the amount of time dedicated to volunteering since the turn of the millennium.”

The paper “Study on Volunteering in the European Union” noted that “There is evidence to imply that it is becoming increasingly difficult to find volunteers who are willing to commit to long-term voluntary positions of responsibility/leadership. Busy working lives have negatively impacted on the time and energy people have to engage in long-term voluntary activities.”

The same trend to decline can also be seen in political participation, as Colin Rochester noted this year:

“Across the UK there has been a marked decline in the involvement of citizens in the conventional political system at national and local level. Fewer people vote in general elections, and the membership of political parties – and active involvement in their activities – have fallen off sharply. And there has been an erosion of the role and status of elected members of local authorities. By contrast there has been an increase of participation in single issue politics and new kinds of campaigning activities for new kinds of causes.”

A local example can be seen in the surge of popular support for the more informal and individualistic “Jersey Lifeboat Association”, contrast with what was seen as a more rigid and formal structure in the RNLI. That’s not to say that either perception is accurate, but this is how and why people engage in single issue causes.

“There is a growing consensus that the ways in which people engage with volunteering have changed. Changes in sports volunteering were summarised by Gratton and colleagues, who ‘concluded that a European trend towards more informal participation in health and fitness related sports and a decline in more traditional team sports was replicated in England’

With busy lives, there has been an increase in what might be termed “episodic volunteering”, where people volunteer their time in a manner which is limited in its scope was expected to be intrinsically rewarding

That of course is another part of the culture shift in society. The historian Tony Judt asks the question:

“In an age where young people are encouraged to maximise self-interest and self advancement, the grounds for altruism or even good behaviour become obscured.”

Crispin Truman described this change:

“In the past, we could be confident that as people matured and had more time they would often develop new interests and priorities that led them into volunteering. We can no longer be confident that will happen.”

“There is a societal shift in public participation. The trends that have led to the closure of pubs and churches, the decline in traditional forms of joining and contributing to society, are the same trends that will undermine charity volunteering.”

The psychology of the modern age finds identity is bound up with such notions as self-discovery or to use Carl Rogers phrase " self actualisation". And it is very much this desire for these that attractive and seductive.

They also take time away from leisure time which might otherwise be spent on community matters. Because of the time that they take, and even more in the way in which the whole philosophy is antithetical to the idea of community service, we have a society in which the older forms of service such as working in charity shops or helping with scouting or helping with the honorary police, come very low on these individualising agendas.

Monday, 2 July 2018

FOI Exclusion Zones: The Bailiff's Chamber











A recent Freedom of Information request highlighted something interesting. It was not the fact that the meal worked out at around £57 per head as that was probably reasonable for a two or three course meal with wine and coffee. What was interesting was the fact that the Bailiffs Chambers is outside the remit of the Freedom of Information Law.

Scheduled public authorities include:

1 The States Assembly including the States Greffe.
2 A Minister.
3 A committee or other body established by resolution of the States or by or in accordance with standing orders of the States Assembly.
4 A department established on behalf of the States.
5 The Judicial Greffe.
6 The Viscount’s department.
6A Andium Homes Limited, registered on 13th May 2014 under registration number 115713.
7 The States of Jersey Police Force.
8 A parish.

So why not the Bailiff's Chamber?



Request

Retiring States members came together with some existing members for a dinner at the Town Hall in May 2018.

A How many people attended?

B What was the total cost of the event excluding any booking the Town Hall?

C Was there any charge for booking the Town Hall, if so what?


Response

Please note that the dinner for retiring States Members was arranged by the Bailiffs Chambers. The Bailiffs Chambers is not a Scheduled Public Authority under the Freedom of lnforrnation (Jersey) Law 2011, but provides the following response in the interest of transparency.
  
A 87

B £4,944.50

C £180.00

Sunday, 1 July 2018

Why were Crypts Built?

From "The Pilot", 1969, comes this, an interesting historical ramble.

Some Church Customs Explained
By S.G. Thicknesse


Why were Crypts Built?

Some of the earliest Christian churches were apparently built above an even earlier vault or crypt, which held the body of a saint. The tradition that the church of St. Peter at Rome was so built, over the burial place of the Apostle, though not above Nero's circus where he was martyred, seems to have been confirmed by the recent excavations at Rome.

This part of a church was, therefore, in some cases not only the oldest but also one of the most sacred parts of the whole building. It is possible that the very word crypt is derived from the same root as the word shroud.

For the first fifty years at Rome, Christians appear to have shared burial places with the Jews: they also believed that the bodies of the departed should be laid in the earth or in the rock, and not burned.

But from the second half of the first century they began to construct their own underground cemeteries beyond the city, or to make use of natural caves under the Appian Way. When collective Christian burial became general, some of the crypts were made large enough for funeral or memorial services to be held in them, although few would have easily held a congregation of more than fifty people.

Although the Eucharist may also have been said in these catacombs even in peaceful times, this certainly became more general in time of persecution. This was not because the catacombs were secret places but because, as cemeteries, they were rigidly protected by Roman law. That similar crypts should continue to be built and used for the saying of the Eucharist, and for burials, after Christianity had become the official religion of the Roman Empire, is easily understandable.

In England there are a few very early crypts, for example, that at Hexham. But churches with crypts became more common when the Romanesque styles of architecture were brought in after the Norman Conquest.

The extraordinarily large and beautiful one under Canterbury Cathedral was started by Prior Ernulf, and finished in A.D. 1105 by Prior Conrad. Some seventy years later, on the same night that he was murdered in the Cathedral, the body of Thomas Becket was carried down to this crypt by the monks of Canterbury and laid in state on a tomb before the altar of the Blessed Virgin.

The next day the Archbishop was buried in the crypt, which remained his shrine for fifty years, and became the dearest place of pilgrimage in the country.

And specially, from every shires ende
Of Engelond, to Canterbury they wende,
The holy blisful martir for to seeke,
That them hath holpen when that they were weeke.

By the fourteenth century when Chaucer was writing the Canterbury Tales, the body of St. Thomas was housed in the great shrine behind the high altar, of which, not much more than a century later, Henry VIII was to leave no trace.

Although no other of the remaining crypts in England is as famous as that of Canterbury, some of them are very lovely-for example, those at Durham and Worcester, or the twelfth-century crypt under the church of St. Peter-in-the-East, in Queen's Lane, at Oxford. This crypt was restored and brought into use again in 1932. Originally, like those in many Italian churches, it was directly accessible from the nave. The passages, however, which used to lead up from the three doorways in the west wall of the crypt were long ago blocked.

It is possible that the barrel-vaulted chamber, eight feet by seven, opening off the crypt, is a twelfth-century reconstruction of an earlier arrangement, which may itself have been a tomb.

Like the catacombs, even the smallest of these crypts is full of ornamentation. In both are to be found the sacred monogram IHS, the three Greek letters which begin the name of JESUS; the XP, the first two Greek letters of CHRIST, and painted or carved foliage and symbolic creatures.

In the crypt of St. Peter's-in-the-East, for example, one capital has a winged dragon and two men and a beast carved on it. Many catacombs had the eagles and peacocks of eternal life, as well as ships of salvation and palms of victory, painted on their walls.