Some election odds from a bookmaker have been released on the forthcoming election for St Helier 3/4.
Being a mathematician, and not used to the strange world of gambling, I wanted to convert these to probabilities, expressed as percentage likelihood, as that is something I understand better than odds of 7 to 6. That may be all well and good if you are betting, but how do us non-gamblers tell the difference between 7/2 and 6/4 for example, and how far they differ.
Fortunately, there is a simple formula - seen at the top of this blog, which does just that. So here are the odds for the gambling types, and in an easier to see as a single ranked number (in my humble opinion) the mathematical conversion.
Anthony Lewis 11/10
|
47.62%
|
Inna Gardiner 6/4
|
40.00%
|
Lyndsay Feltham 7/2
|
22.22%
|
John Baker 9/2
|
18.18%
|
Andea Mallett 8/1
|
11.11%
|
Francesca Ahier 8/1
|
11.11%
|
Guy de Faye 20/1
|
4.76%
|
Gordon Troy 20/1
|
4.76%
|
Nick Le Cornu 25/1
|
3.85%
|
Geraint Jennings
33/1
|
2.94%
|
Incidentally, the percentages total more that 100% which is significant.
This is the "bookie's edge".
If it is under 100% it is a "sure bet" for the gambler
If it is more than 100% then it means bookie is making money on overall population of gamblers. They are also mitigating their risk (on average they win but there is volatility) of loss on a single event by modifying the odds based on the bets they have received so far as time gets nearer to the event.
This is the "bookie's edge".
If it is under 100% it is a "sure bet" for the gambler
If it is more than 100% then it means bookie is making money on overall population of gamblers. They are also mitigating their risk (on average they win but there is volatility) of loss on a single event by modifying the odds based on the bets they have received so far as time gets nearer to the event.
No comments:
Post a Comment