I’ve been looking at an interesting report, “Learning
from French Hospital Design” by Richard
G Saxon CBE of Building Design Partnership” which came to light in a recent FOI
request.
Although it is dated from May 2004, the basic elements of
how French hospitals cost less than UK ones is certainly worth considering. One
of the major arguments from Scrutiny was that the price differential was
unbelievable, but this document demonstrates that is false – it is all to do
with different methodology in hospital design and built.
By turning our attention only to UK design and UK
consultants supplying costs, the whole investigation of French hospitals has
rather fallen under the radar.
In this respect, there seems to have been a certain
degree of non-factual comments made in the media, in particular by at least one
columnist in the JEP, who has argued that the “Centre hospitalier (Carcassonne)”
came in at a much greater cost. I wondered where there was evidence for that, and it look a long
time before I uncovered costings which showed it was expensive, but not nearly
as much as £480 million.
Here’s a translation of part of that document.
"The New Hospital opened in May 2014. As a result of
the 2012 hospital plan, the new hospital was financed by borrowing (140,000,000
Euros) And self-financing (19,500,000 Euros). With a surface area of 53,757
square meters, the Nouvel Hospital welcomes the activities of Medicine,
Surgery, Obstetrics with 496 beds, places and positions including...:."
(https://www.hopital.fr/annuaire-etablissement/centre-hospitalier-carcassonne,4090?fbclid=IwAR2AJX7UtrMjOujTgFan2xRstjZfcl2xt5n42e28pEueDY-qh3k8nYLJ5WI)
I do wish people would cite sources when making statements, Wikipedia demands it, and our standards should be as rigorous. It looks as if it was a lot less (even with exchange rates) than £480,000,000.
And here’s some snippets on hospital design from the
Saxon report:
Extracts from “Learning
from French Hospital Design”
At 2002 rates, French hospitals cost between half and two
thirds of the cost of UK hospitals per m1, but per bed they are more similar.
Area per bed is much higher in France, with single bed wards used universally. Arguably,
each French bed space outperforms its UK counterpart. Building Servicing costs
in France are less than half those of the UK, with French comments that the UK
over-specifies. More ambitious automation and ICT are used in France. Fabric
costs dominate French examples as they plan for natural daylighting and
ventilation and thus generate more gross plan area than UK and US examples.
Contractor-led detail design seems to lie behind much of
the economy of means; many Egan—advocated processes are used. Consultants' fees
are however comparatively high as a percentage.
The benefits of this approach contribute to the better
health outcomes of the French system. Single bed wards assist faster recovery.
Daylit plans and good amenities aid staff wellbeing. Better architecture
fosters community pride and user morale.
UK construction
produces high output costs to customers from low input costs in professional
and trade labour and materials, compared to most EC countries. This fact is at
the root of the Egan critique, pointing out that we have a wasteful system
which would cost even more if we paid our professionals and tradesmen better.
The waste in the system is variously estimated at around 30%, the amount which
might be saved if better practices were used. Egan specifically highlights
design and construction process integration, standardisation and
prefabrication, and the replacement of tendering to assemble teams with established
supply relationships.
Looking at French design and construction it is possible
to see several of the Egan goals in place, but in ways specific to France.
Whilst the design process begins with no contractor involvement, they become
involved sooner than in the UK and take responsibility for much of the detailed
design and specification. They are more likely to buy standard components and
systems from regular suppliers in bulk and to predicted flows, not on a project
by project basis. These supply relationships enable manufacturers to be
profitable whilst charging less per item. In practice, the small and sporadic
UK orders are probably not even for the standard product as we are notorious
for customising everything. As an example, similar hospital bed lifts can cost
half as much in France as they do in UK.
No comments:
Post a Comment